Saturated philosophy

The relation between materialistic philosophy and nature science is an inner necessary condition of their rationale to exist. The substantiation between these philosophies tends to exist until we establish connection with reality.

Fundamental theories are mostly based on accentuation and significance between present time and philosophical conceptions. The results are mostly coveted from realistic ideas and reality in itself. Among those who conceive philosophical science to be theirs are those holding their religious-mystical interpretation more than anything else. The dogmatisation of this belief is a result of their inner-tide.

The methodical completion of duties versus those believing on natural convictions can be seen as a befitting comparison of ideological beliefs and natural science, in other words, natural philosophy. More often than not, conventionalists believe in absolutism, but it often lacks objective reality. It dates back to ancient mystics, mythic and often stress on ones beliefs. In this area, philosophical trend has largely remains unchanged. The cognitive factor here is noesis (i.e., perception, learning and reasoning). So the philosophical opinions are often misinterpreted to their needs and benefits. On the other hand, natural science paves way to logical constructs and avoids irrational intuitions. Natural science confronts the aesthetically pleasing statements of fundamentalists who are more often auxiliary to promoting agents.

Today, the philosophical desires are driven by beliefs and ones interpretations lying to their favour. Such methodological consequences drive them to their zone of comfort. Dialectical conclusions are barely seen with such ideological orientation. They are widely seen as axioms. In theory, ideological beliefs largely depend on imagination and certain degree of assumptions.

When we inspect the consequence of enlightenment, we also need to circumspect nirvana and sudden realisation of nirvana if at all, you believe it exists. This is nothing but psychoanalytic paradigm. Just like the floor beneath the table adding aesthetical value to the table, philosophy beneath the enlightenment adding flavour to it. Science determines hallucination as the direct result of delusive thoughts, illusory perceptions and largely a mental disorder. Rather perturbed. People claim philosophical solutions to hallucinations and that could be true if the solution relates to fundamental science.

Materialist philosophy will not, rather cannot address flustered conditions. The dialect of materialism is only subjected to matter, with little interest in ethical or spiritual matters. Well, it is true in most cases. After all, dialectical materialism concerns with practical matters and is not beyond the fundamental science.

Fundamental Science or natural Science is quite distinctly separate from materialistic philosophy. Science of Science will permeate the whole spirit of it. On the surface, philosophy is neither materialism nor idealism. Philosophical doctrine, or school of thought should base rational investigation on questions with ethics. Philosophy is often authoritative than intellectual reasoning. We often hear subjective idealism and this is where masses are headed to. Being subjective is saturation on its whole. So philosophical axioms are more often morbid than not.

The free formation of scientific thoughts signifies the isolation of objective reality. So the transition of consciousness from sensory forms prevents us from accepting saturated philosophies and axioms. On the other hand, imaginary theses provides more adduction to yet another argument. Therefore, philosophical views are antipodes to subjective reality.