Saturated philosophy

The relation between materialistic philosophy and nature science is an inner necessary condition of their rationale to exist. The substantiation between these philosophies tends to exist until we establish connection with reality.

Fundamental theories are mostly based on accentuation and significance between present time and philosophical conceptions. The results are mostly coveted from realistic ideas and reality in itself. Among those who conceive philosophical science to be theirs are those holding their religious-mystical interpretation more than anything else. The dogmatisation of this belief is a result of their inner-tide.

The methodical completion of duties versus those believing on natural convictions can be seen as a befitting comparison of ideological beliefs and natural science, in other words, natural philosophy. More often than not, conventionalists believe in absolutism, but it often lacks objective reality. It dates back to ancient mystics, mythic and often stress on ones beliefs. In this area, philosophical trend has largely remains unchanged. The cognitive factor here is noesis (i.e., perception, learning and reasoning). So the philosophical opinions are often misinterpreted to their needs and benefits. On the other hand, natural science paves way to logical constructs and avoids irrational intuitions. Natural science confronts the aesthetically pleasing statements of fundamentalists who are more often auxiliary to promoting agents.

Today, the philosophical desires are driven by beliefs and ones interpretations lying to their favour. Such methodological consequences drive them to their zone of comfort. Dialectical conclusions are barely seen with such ideological orientation. They are widely seen as axioms. In theory, ideological beliefs largely depend on imagination and certain degree of assumptions.

When we inspect the consequence of enlightenment, we also need to circumspect nirvana and sudden realisation of nirvana if at all, you believe it exists. This is nothing but psychoanalytic paradigm. Just like the floor beneath the table adding aesthetical value to the table, philosophy beneath the enlightenment adding flavour to it. Science determines hallucination as the direct result of delusive thoughts, illusory perceptions and largely a mental disorder. Rather perturbed. People claim philosophical solutions to hallucinations and that could be true if the solution relates to fundamental science.

Materialist philosophy will not, rather cannot address flustered conditions. The dialect of materialism is only subjected to matter, with little interest in ethical or spiritual matters. Well, it is true in most cases. After all, dialectical materialism concerns with practical matters and is not beyond the fundamental science.

Fundamental Science or natural Science is quite distinctly separate from materialistic philosophy. Science of Science will permeate the whole spirit of it. On the surface, philosophy is neither materialism nor idealism. Philosophical doctrine, or school of thought should base rational investigation on questions with ethics. Philosophy is often authoritative than intellectual reasoning. We often hear subjective idealism and this is where masses are headed to. Being subjective is saturation on its whole. So philosophical axioms are more often morbid than not.

The free formation of scientific thoughts signifies the isolation of objective reality. So the transition of consciousness from sensory forms prevents us from accepting saturated philosophies and axioms. On the other hand, imaginary theses provides more adduction to yet another argument. Therefore, philosophical views are antipodes to subjective reality.  

For whom the God that failed

There are reasons for you to laugh and there are reasons for you to breathe a sigh. There is never an ideal moment so take hold of chance. Opportunities only knock at heaven’s door and you better be sure of it.

There are Gods, devotees, intermittent players and then we have atheists. Above all, we have almighty who gets the score rolling. Start throwing stones and you will surely pile enough.

As a famous saying goes; God gives and forgives, man takes and forgets. The almighty sets the precedence and God calls the shots. Devotees are executers and sometimes (only) fill the mere numbers. We need to know that we have dynamic Gods who have messengers who govern the entire system. Just as large and bureaucratic organisations.

For a moment, let us think of this system as the one that exists in the corporations. We have executives, leaders, followers and then oppressors. Corporations call them Bad and Good Apples. A similar system exists in the society.

Almighty nominates God who calls the shots and destroy opponents. In corporations, leaders nominates God (whom we call leader) who picks up favourable devotees and messengers to form a team. Atheists and intermittent players exist only to add spice to the team and/or will execute tougher decisions made by the God in the name of risk.

Devotees often gets the best share of everything. Devotees sometimes act as messenger to God resulting in conflicts with actual messengers. God settles scores with both of them. God lays down a drawing to all his devotees and messengers to keep the atheists in check. Often times, these devotees and messengers cook up imaginary stories to please God. God then bestows them with awards and recognition. In all of these, atheists and intermittent players take the beating and often fall as puppets to the lead players. Devotees and messengers are considered Good Apples whilst atheists and intermittent players take the role of the Bad. So to speak, imagination has no boundary.

Large organisations or corporations often present the world with these surprises. They are no longer taken by surprise and are accepted as postulates. Similar line of practise exists in the civilian society.

Let me take an example of a large organisation which once consisted of a loathsome God, devotees, messengers and atheists. This was called a team with justified balance of each fist-fighting each other for survival. Not so surprisingly, God called the shots, devotees and messengers were bestowed and atheist left the organisation fiercely burnt and cheated. There came a day when devotees looked after their needs and moved away. Messengers become less and less effective and their messages no longer brought surprise or entertainment. Messengers were thus asked to leave and thanked for their dedicated services.

Then came a day that everyone was waiting. God left his temple of the doom in an unceremonious manner. Someone who could smell the symptom of the universe kicked the bucket and God looked impassively. By the end of time, God had lost all his mettle and defiance. People around the world watched God’s exit with jubilance. There was sense of celebration as God was cornered by the most pressing fashion. God lived his glory and society learnt the lesson the hard way. God will no longer pose that threat he once posed. It was a moment of intense satisfaction to see God exit in a nimble fashion who once left the ultimate taste of bitterness.

Some devotees and messengers also turned out to play safe or atheists came out to celebrate this moment. There was no end to it.

 God started his dominant administration years ago. With the blessing of almighty, God recruited devotees and messengers over the years. Some atheists were trapped from other temples and some were forcibly dragged in with purpose. Months passed and God’s team was in full attendance. The team had a fairly balanced mixture of devotees, messengers, atheists and intermittent players. God started his authoritarian and totalitarian rule over his people which soon turned out to be a temple of the doom. Some even called it as temple for the damned.

God never spared anyone. Even the God of other faith was not spared. God ridiculed everyone who came in his way. There was nothing stopping God from his atrocities which soon turned into pit of hell. God’s ruling thus became a fascist model with pseudo roles created to achieve his autocracy. 

Even other super-powers looked impassive at one moment. Just like an old saying, my enemy’s enemy is my best friend; all his rivals teamed up to get rid of the God. Almighty saved the day for God and his ruling was temporarily held back to reflect the new way of thinking.

God returned to his past glory following the utter defeat of atheists and similar minds. Sense of peace was shattered within his team, several atheists and intermittent players were tortured and forced to leave the temple. Those who resisted were subjected to intense wanton infliction who were either forced to leave or accept defeat. God then declared his temple as the temple of the king. Just like the state of Hiroshima in WW-II; the after-effects remained even to this date, several atheists still feel the bad taste even to this date.

Over the years, God’s ruling reached the pinnacle of incompetence. Several others noted the incompetency of his beloved devotees and messengers. Outsiders made efforts to slay them off the temple thus resulting in de-strengthening God’s powers. Some turned to the light of day. Some did not even reached that far. All the competent atheists left his temple expecting the remaining thugs to be damned.

Years passed and no solution was found. In the aftermath of outside advocacy, certain people in the temple were targeted. Even the bigwigs could not break the armour of God. Messengers kept smelling the bad spirit and gave much-needed clues to God to slay the people off. Just as a saying goes; every damn thing has to end one day; God lost some of his key players to the open-universe and in Blue sky.

The bygone effect was long felt and his atheists were far from his vicious intentions. Several devotees mended their ways for better lives. One of his messenger who was initially tortured out of suspicion later was promoted to a devotee and then awarded him with a ‘warpig’ label. This warpig later turned to be a brutal force of madness. This warpig kept his own devotees who later left his path as they were unable to bear his torture.

There came a time when almighty, God and warpig left to run their forceless kingdom. It was about time when God was made defenseless and stripped off with all his powers. Warpig was silently watching all of this in the background hoping to claim the diadem if comes a day when God is slayed off. Warpig had developed a secret route to almighty when God had other distractions. At times, warpig turned smarter than God and God had to use his brute force to stop his march.

The day finally came which everyone was so desperately waiting for. To add more spice to the story, some former atheists were even willing to behead God if found outside the temple. Fortunately or unfortunately, it did not happen. Some unexpected forces kicked God out of his temple of the doom.

God was impassive and was kicked out in an unceremonious manner. The news reached all his former-opponents and atheists in lightning pace. Some took to streets to celebrate this much-anticipated moment. It was glory justified for some and rest took it with pinch of salt.

It also took some devotees by shock and equally surprise. Even though his devotees did not actively come out in public to express their view, it was noted that they took the news with caution.

Few atheists called one-another and wished each-other. All the bad things once made as mandate came to an end. There is no structure of almighty, God, devotees, messengers and atheists that exists in his former guise today. But this is still an active practise in large organisations, corporations and the typical societal structures.

In the meantime, warpig approached the almighty to claim the crown. Whilst some have already left the playground, others are still watching how games turned out in its final stages. The flier even said of God reaching to his lost souls for solace. Who knows! He might have got what he wanted.

The madness is certainly over.

While people took to task actively to destroy the final remains of his temple of doom, his former devotees and messengers might be heading towards the grave for last rites.

I hope to have given a reasonable end to this fictitious yet comforting tale around the daily state of affairs surrounding such maniacs in day-to-day world.

As the saying goes; those who won are lost and lost are perished, God is now gone and blown with the wind. 

Gowramma

What strikes your mind when you hear Gowramma from far behind? Someone who is naïve and primitive? Someone who cannot catch up with social demands? Someone who is lacks worldly knowledge and shrewdness? Well! It could be cumulus of all or none of these.

The very perception is steadily escalating sense of premonition. Whilst name seldom heeds to attentivenesses, we grow under the shadow or assumption or what is perceived under favourable notes.

I was intrigued to think and write on the matter when I visited a restaurant last evening and observed a family with strange behaviour. Being definitely ordinary is usual but what spills out is slightly odd or weird. The family consisted of two couples, kids and an old man who could probably be the father or head of the family. The father or the old man looked mostly naïve and remained unaffected by the hissing noise of the children and boos expressed by his daughter-in-laws. The two look-alike sons remained silent throughout their stay at the restaurant and never got a chance to speak, or remained quiet for good.

I was often distracted by the Germany-Italy football match on the large screen but I tried not to fall asleep by not looking at this family. The wives or daughter-in-laws kept scrolling through the menu, commenting on the dishes whilst the waiter continued to wait.

One of the daughter-in-law made the bold move by asking the waiter to explain the ingredients of a dish, justify the pricing and so on. The entire act looked like a supernatural act and the weird sister-in-laws thoroughly deserved a diadem for it.

On the contrary of it all, the uncanny sister-in-laws looked very primitive and sounded utterly foolhardy. I took my eyes of the football game to watch the proceeding on this family. One of the weird sister-in-laws finally ordered Koithio (or mie goring) with much hesitation and when the dish arrived, I could sense her shabbier approach in serving. She stabbed the fork to the Omelet and the beaten egg was just about to be dropped off the bowl.

Conditionally, this made think of my younger days when these girls grow up in conservative families with restrictive surroundings. To makes things worse, the bridegrooms these families get too arrive from similar background thus making them master of puppets. Beyond engineering, medicine, sound bank-balance, two legs, hands, eyes et.al, father of the bride is mostly fine.

The circus starts when these newly-wed couples travel to their most desired destination, United States. Even their short visit across the Pacific makes them perfectly placed jokers in the circus. They start planning much ahead of time such that their kids grow into age and they forget how they lived in their yesteryear. Such couple change their dressing, food habits and approach to life so differently that someone like Dwight Eisenhower and the likes would think they are actually native Americans. 

Their accent suddenly changes and I wonder if this makes William Shakespeare forget his own.

The stupidity is yet to come. Their first visit back home completes the circus. Everything back home is compared to their newly adapted township. Cleanliness becomes paramount all of a sudden. Every act is questioned for rationale and so on and forth.

Adding more agony to the train of consequences, they go on endlessly appreciating their newly adapted township and market their appeal. Initially, friends and foes ignore the blast as excitement before someone recommends them to visit the nearest mental asylum. Perhaps, this does not change them either.

The character ‘Gowramma’ makes more sense introducing here at this point. This also added more juice to the goulash. Once the Gowramma is now a United States return and now knows it all. The autonomous structure of our society sadly upholds such Gowrammas effectively making a sad system.

Mother Earth has been bearing such nuisance for a long time and adding more vacant dreams to all of us. Years roll by, times do change and truth around us are harder in disguise as we face tomorrow. These Gowrammas are increasingly becoming common as I continue to wonder how a trip to the town across the Pacific can change one’s life so much.

I continue to wonder anyway.

Unsurmountable Imagination

For those who believe imagination has no age understands the world as a canvas to the imagination. Reality often leaves a lot to the imagination. Just like our doyens say; imagination and fiction makes up more than quarter of our lives. I have a vivid imagination that reality of the people is of those who lack imagination. Will imagination and dream ever be the same? Probably not. Fantasy mirrors desire and imagination reshapes it. We grow by exercise and contrary to that is the common belief. Surely, power of imagination makes it infinite and unsurmountable.

How subtle is the difference between dream, imagination and assumption? We imagine two notes to synchronise. Does it happen? In reality, it overlaps. In an overture, we play the second note when the first one is half done. We imagine it. Imagination is a virtual state of mind whereas dream creates mental images and emotions ideally occurring during sleep. Assumption is the hypothesis often taken for granted. However vivid or lucid your dream is, it often has the grotesque side of it.

Once again, the series of mental images or emotions could be the resultant of imaginative thoughts. Did you get how imagination and dream could be? Yes, it is. Albeit distinctive from its own nature, both imagination and dream are quite lucid. Yet they generate lifelike images circling you back to where you were before. It could quite be your mental representation of thoughts or confusion of impressions.

To a certain nature, impressions get along quite well with imagination. Both deal with vague ideas in which confidence is placed. The resultant could be an outward appearance or could be a favourable mental image.

When you look at subtle difference between illusion and fallacy, illusions deals with erroneous mental representation whilst fallacy deals with misconception and incorrect reasoning. They are all different in nature. Do we represent them correctly when we connote them in separate scenarios? Maybe not. Finer distinctions are often misread.

When imagination is unrestricted or unsurmountable, it becomes fantasy. When your optimism and imagination is more, you are often less biased. This objective consideration helps in being fair and prevents preconception. Often times, we use our freewill and discretion to form opinions. Ideally, this should not be the case. Our opinions should be undistorted by emotion or personal bias.

There was this time when I started to think how imagination and beliefs have overlaid our lives. Do we sense it? Are they the realm of sense or occult? I do not know. Beliefs are the psychological result of perception, learning and reasoning. Not necessarily true in all sense. Religion for instance deals with belief of supernatural power that control human destiny. Religion believes in divine power whilst science believes on experiments and observation. A lot of illogical imagination or perception may occur without the intervention of science. Religion and morality are not one and the same. Morality is based on ideas of right and wrong, good and evil. Religion cannot ascertain faith without ethics thus giving room for imagination and perception.

In moral philosophy, we have moral values and rules. These rules in principle are regarded as normative but in my opinion, they are conventional. In the end, we live in the world of fantasy. We live in the world of deceit. We dissimulate our identity in many cases and live in disguise.

We camouflage, conceal, imagine, believe and misrepresent ourselves with an outward semblance. Ultimately, we all live in our own mental representation and our egocentric behaviour does not permit our perceptions to fall through. We call this mother wit. Be it or not.

Culture or state of perfection?

We are often intrigued with question whether culture plays any role in enhancing our knowledge in art and manners or is it an everyday refinement? I do not know yet.

We keep hearing from all sides that each one of us possess rich culture and therefore deserve to have higher values shared by the society. Some people are engaged in social groups that are claimed to have rich taste in history, art and manners will therefore allow them to mingle with those selected sects. Is that what we call culture? I do not know yet, but I will soon find out.

Who enriches patience and tolerance? Or is culture reserved to those who acquire superior intellectual or social or economic status? Or does culture restricts you to certain religion, caste and embodiment? Does culture takes shape on concrete representation of benevolent behaviour? Or is benevolence being confused with sympathy, generosity and freeheartedness? Will any of this piece represent culture? In fairness, none of these.

Largely, cultural practices are still confined to religious sacraments, faith in supernatural power and unseen morality. This is truly the state of mind amongst masses. Having said that, the intensity of belief differs from social upbringing. In my view, culture is an ornamental sovereignty. Masses believe it, a smaller bunch question it and rest cares less.

A girl grown in my neighourhood thinks quite differently. Every word spoken by her parents is a conformance to reality irrespective of what you see, feel or perceive. The atmosphere in which she is growing makes her think that way. For her; caste, religion and belief plays utmost role in her life. She is reluctant in accepting what is proven by science or confirms to principles or methods used in science. This sort of adherence to culture, caste and religion forbids someone from experimenting with truth or reality. Culture is vaguely and distinctly dissimilar to what is perceived. In the name of culture, some use it to develop state of perfection, some use it to develop social groups. This girl seeks blessing from God to come out good in examination instead of working hard. The culture in itself is torn into pieces.

The moral value in which culture operates is quite high. There are symbolic connotations to every culture which is presiding in various social groups. You are often booed by such social groups when you deflect from such thoughts or practice. I call this exodus.

Most of these social groups or cultural groups are marred by those with obvious intentions. People with different traits often fail in such gathering. To certain extent, or in certain sect or culture, money ciphers your position, belief and knowledge to some degree.

Obeisance is not just reverence but also a sign of submission or shame. These are not just benevolent boons but also capitulation. These are often mistaken to resplendence or glory. People rehearse to be near-perfect and stay on top of such social groups. There is no state of perfection to culture or socialization. Culture in other words are for those people with similar mindset in certain social groups or practise what seems perfect.

Race to perfection has no finish line.

Nuclear families in the modern society

Philosophy often leads to rational investigation of questions about its existence, knowledge and ethics. I do not mean philosophy can go beyond personal belief or the compound of doctrines. What we perceive, wish to hear or feel mostly becomes our philosophy. These type of practices need not necessarily be constituted to old school of thought. One such philosophies developed in the modern times are nuclear families.

It is not very surprising to see conjugal families paving way to nuclear families with the emergence of industrialisation and capitalism. Some adrift without direction and rest are totally aimless. Larger families have undergone substantial social reform so to speak that they no longer exist. I have seen people sighting difference in opinions and claim they require higher vetoing power in order to sustain this paradigm shift. Extended and larger families no longer exists in its true sense.

Some say that they have moved on from the traditional practices sighting pragmatism. I am somewhat convinced I have moved away from typical family traditions for the sake of convenience, luxury or lavishness. This is often sighted as sumptuousness. I quite agree to it.

As we drift into practical matters, I started questioning the very existence of tradition and rationale behind it. The fundamental reasons or logic behind these traditions are hard to explain. Just how we relate lucrativeness to sizeable profits, moneymaking and remuneration; we tend to cripple traditions due to absence of social ideas or system.

During my formative years, I hung onto a coniferous tree just because my forefathers planted it. Neither I was pragmatic nor had to courage to question by forefathers about the practice that I was asked to follow. Something does not feel quite right. As I grew older, I grew into oblivion. It is difficult to explain your compeers about your social patterns, likes and dislikes. You are often disregarded or forgotten. Albeit it means very little in this context, you still linger to find out what is happening on the other side of the divide. This curiosity often kills the cat.

Whilst we hover around, leave slowly and hesitantly; someone else is making unfavourable criticism or find faults of your shortcomings. Traditionists are sometimes stubbornly conservative and narrow-minded. Being prudent does not mean you circumspect the situation with discreet. This is precisely what happens to those who swim against the tide. Then you moan in despair and dismay. Somewhere you reach a state in which all hopes are lost or assume they are absent.

I am often confronted by traditionists, often facing hostile opposition for the same reason and I think otherwise on their practices. The most hilarious thing is when they drag science into it and fail to exhibit the relation between the two. Science examines the questions posed by scientific theories and hypotheses whereas tradition is an inherited pattern adhering to traditional views. I see no science in it unless science proves it otherwise.

You have been living here so long undisturbed, dream of the time when you were free and undisturbed and suddenly you are encompassed into these traditional practices. You no longer pick those pieces, put they away. Several nuclear families today are formed as an oppression to these traditional views and illogical relations to the practical matter. With the retrospection on how families lived, none of them went any further to question the society in which they lived. For sure, this is an ordeal of the past if not trial by fire.

These are hell's perpetual fires for the years and decades to come. I am more profoundly concerned about the changes we live in. Lot of modern day nuclear families are more dynamic, affluent and well planned. However, this does not mean they are sound in their judgements. The older generation continue to claim they are the realm of the occult but that may not be the case in all true sense. If you look at the sizeable combination of both conjugal and nuclear families, there is an element of truth on both sides. Practical living is often mistaken to being correct or appropriate. You need to ratify in order to ascertain the truth or the fact behind it. The tales are twisted to the need of the individual and thus nothing ascertains the practical examination of the fact.

We all agree as far as we can see. It is just the way of the world. Nothing comes out as surprise than blatant ignorance. The formation of nuclear families not just lies with difference in opinion or compatibility. It is far beyond driven. In some cases, they are strong and a sudden outburst. Someone who can make clear distinctions and find the subtle difference between one another will know for sure that system has failed.

In the years to come, there will be more nuclear families rising from East to West, North to South and beyond the horizons. People will be grossly blasphemous towards what is held to be sacred, religious and what is cited as traditional boundaries. This in turn becomes exodus and the new pattern may follow.

With the course of every sunrise and sunset, there arises a person questioning the rationale behind the traditions, religions and practices we followed. Life goes on!

Convulsion of thoughts

The very idea of putting convulsion of thoughts is not to slip by with my ideas and opinions. These are by far and large practical to what we undergo in my daily lives. Subjectiveness is often opposed to objectiveness. These thoughts are culmination of both objective and subjective and I do not intend to dwell into the appropriateness of the subject any longer.

Grass is Greener on the other side – A war broke years ago and each side of the divide feels the other better. None went any further thinking we are ought to fight and die anyway. If the other side have better equipment, you are bound to die sooner rather than later. Sometimes, your position is well equipped with certainly and intention

Inspiration – Today, we have more people to inspire than to follow or perform. The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are. Those who ought to like you for whatever you are will continue to do so. There is no paradigm of perfection or concise. We life by our intuitions and that is the most appropriate thing to do

Motivation – I do not see this being very different from Inspiration. A lot of people have taken to motivate/ inspire people without fully or not knowing the very intend of life. It is so difficult to explain someone what your goals are why you wish to do it differently. When someone cannot motivate oneself, how do you expect such a genius to motivate you? The very rationale of life is to be what you are and be proud to do right things at the right time

Compare – Another form of frustration. The feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals. Someone who does not know your journey compares you to those who are completely different to you and bogs your down. Your intellectual ability is not a direct proportion on number of inventions or doing things differently. A good smelling fruit need not be tasty. You have your goals, ambitions and desire. Make your own road

Education versus knowledge – Dwelling on this matter makes me more objective and nothing else. To quote Albert Einstein in this regard, I learnt that knowledge is more important than education. Not necessarily vice versa. This may not apply to government retired people, corporate people and few intellects around the world

Analogy – Not very different from assumptions. We do not see what we believe and believe what we do not see. Intuitions, perceptions, interpretations, assumptions and guess work are probably the reason for all of these. When you set your mind, you will neither change, nor wish to let go your ego. Sometimes, you know a bit and assume the rest. This completes the analogy

Effectiveness – The most effective work invented in twentieth century. Very physiological in nature. No one knows what it actually means and intends to remove abrasiveness in your sentence. Expecting or concluding someone’s effectiveness is only your perceptions, not the real matter. At that time, our opinions matter the most and acts are prelude to the ongoing assassination

Sane – Often refers to mental health. Those who are sane never show up and those who do are never sane. You cannot do the same thing again and again and expect different results. Sound judgments are always reasonable. Philosophy starts only after logic ends, not the otherwise

Manners – Your social deportment does not represent your true stature. Getting off the road, playing in the slush and few mischievous activities does not make you mannerless. Those who are in five-piece-suit always gets buried in their best suit. If all of these is for money, a race driver earns more than a corporate executive, Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates were dropouts and ended up as billionaires. All of these folks did what they liked. There is no definition to manners

Law of the land - You need not act as a roman in Rome if you paying a short visit. I do not think any of us intend to spend all of lives in the office and so to adjust our attitude, character and habits. A good life is important, you define it