The relation between materialistic philosophy and nature
science is an inner necessary condition of their rationale to exist. The
substantiation between these philosophies tends to exist until we establish
connection with reality.
Fundamental theories are mostly based on accentuation and significance
between present time and philosophical conceptions. The results are mostly
coveted from realistic ideas and reality in itself. Among those who conceive
philosophical science to be theirs are those holding their religious-mystical
interpretation more than anything else. The dogmatisation of this belief is a
result of their inner-tide.
The methodical completion of duties versus those believing
on natural convictions can be seen as a befitting comparison of ideological
beliefs and natural science, in other words, natural philosophy. More often
than not, conventionalists believe in absolutism, but it often lacks objective
reality. It dates back to ancient mystics, mythic and often stress on ones
beliefs. In this area, philosophical trend has largely remains unchanged. The cognitive
factor here is noesis (i.e., perception, learning and reasoning). So the
philosophical opinions are often misinterpreted to their needs and benefits. On
the other hand, natural science paves way to logical constructs and avoids
irrational intuitions. Natural science confronts the aesthetically pleasing
statements of fundamentalists who are more often auxiliary to promoting agents.
Today, the philosophical desires are driven by beliefs and
ones interpretations lying to their favour. Such methodological consequences
drive them to their zone of comfort. Dialectical conclusions are barely seen
with such ideological orientation. They are widely seen as axioms. In theory, ideological
beliefs largely depend on imagination and certain degree of assumptions.
When we inspect the consequence of enlightenment, we also
need to circumspect nirvana and sudden realisation of nirvana if at all, you
believe it exists. This is nothing but psychoanalytic paradigm. Just like the
floor beneath the table adding aesthetical value to the table, philosophy
beneath the enlightenment adding flavour to it. Science determines hallucination
as the direct result of delusive thoughts, illusory perceptions and largely a
mental disorder. Rather perturbed. People claim philosophical solutions to
hallucinations and that could be true if the solution relates to fundamental
science.
Materialist philosophy will not, rather cannot address
flustered conditions. The dialect of materialism is only subjected to matter, with
little interest in ethical or spiritual matters. Well, it is true in most
cases. After all, dialectical materialism concerns with practical matters and
is not beyond the fundamental science.
Fundamental Science or natural Science is quite distinctly
separate from materialistic philosophy. Science of Science will permeate the
whole spirit of it. On the surface, philosophy is neither materialism nor
idealism. Philosophical doctrine, or school of thought should base rational
investigation on questions with ethics. Philosophy is often authoritative than
intellectual reasoning. We often hear subjective idealism and this is where
masses are headed to. Being subjective is saturation on its whole. So
philosophical axioms are more often morbid than not.
The free formation of scientific thoughts signifies the
isolation of objective reality. So the transition of consciousness from sensory
forms prevents us from accepting saturated philosophies and axioms. On the
other hand, imaginary theses provides more adduction to yet another argument. Therefore,
philosophical views are antipodes to subjective reality.
